
saucy ankles, c. 1920s
Someone found a bylaw that prohibits sauntering on the subway. Sauntering and lingering, to be exact. I’m really more of a strutter, anyway, or a strider. With the right boots, I might mosey. On a bad day, I have been known to slink.
Last night, my editor called me in a panic. She’d been unable to get the editor’s letter written for the next issue and it had to be to the printer by midnight. She sent me what she had and asked me to rewrite, reorganize, whatever I had to do to get it done. We’ve really only instituted the editor’s letter in the last few issues – the last one was a joint effort. It looks like this one is, too. It took me about four hours. At only 370 words, it became very apparent that writing for print is much more nerve wracking than writing here. Add to that I was writing (at my editor’s request) about the recent Toronto Slut Walk – an issue I hadn’t really given much thought.
If you hadn’t heard, the Slut Walk was organized as protest to a statement made by a Toronto police officer. While giving a talk about personal safety to a room full of female law students, he said that women should “avoid dressing like sluts in order to not be victimized.” I hope we can all agree it was a pretty unfortunate thing to say. But outrage isn’t really my thing, so while lots of our staffers were up in arms, I didn’t get too excited. I have no doubt the cop felt he was doing these women a favour by being “honest” and obviously he wasn’t much of a thinker. But last night I had to really think about it – and it’s shitty.
First, fuck you for suggesting that sexual assault is about sex. I mean, we’ve all agreed that’s a fallacy, right? Or else women in hijab would be safe, and women in their homes, and children and grannies. Those provocative grannies! If a shop owner was being interviewed after a robbery, an investigator wouldn’t ask him why he had such nice things in his store. (And don’t even suggest the whole “if you leave your car unlocked” scenario. First and foremost, a human being is not a car and, secondly, “unlocked” is not “permission to take.”) Fuck you for suggesting that I am responsible for someone else’s criminal behaviour. Full stop.
I was shocked to read, after the walk, that a columnist in a major paper actually said something like “the last thing you want to do is antagonize the people tasked with protecting you.” Because why, exactly? Is there some threat of officers refusing to uphold the law if you annoy them? Fuck you, too, for suggesting my safety is contingent on my being polite.
And then there’s the whole notion that “slut” has a single definition everyone understands. How do you dress like a slut? Is it a short skirt? What if it’s paired with flat shoes – does that still count? What if I wear baggy clothes, but with high heels? What if my clothes are tight, but they cover all of me? One doesn’t have to look very far to realize that, like “beautiful” or “ugly” or “good advice,” slut is a pretty subjective concept. And you know, fuck you, officer, for your arrogance in suggesting it’s not.
So I got mad and the letter got done.
But I do hate to do things at the last minute like that – no fact checking, no copy editor. I had to send the copy straight to the Art Director to drop into the layout and off it went. I woke up at 4 AM in a white panic. I realized that I wrote “thousands of women organized” which makes no sense. Rather, I should have written “thousands of women participated in.” Ah well.
I guess I should let it go and sashay to work.
g.